“At
last, at last!” Anthony Comstock’s diary exulted in January
1873. “Thank God!” The source of the moral crusader’s
joy was the successful indictment of influential publisher Frank Leslie
under the 1868 obscenity law. The sweeping New York State statute, promoted
by Comstock’s patron, the Young Men’s Christian Association,
covered every form of printed material and, for the first time, authorized
police search and seizure. Comstock had come into public prominence only
two months earlier for arresting the flamboyant feminist sisters Victoria
Woodhull and Tennessee Claflin for distributing their “obscene”
weekly newspaper through the mail. But he had been pursuing Leslie for
some time, and on January 14th, his quarry seemed in reach. “At
last,” his diary entry continued, “action is commenced against
this terrible curse. Now for a mighty blow for the young.” What was
this exceedingly public and alternately shady publication? The Days’
Doings held a distinctive place among the magazines and books published
by the British immigrant engraver who was born Henry Carter but gained
fame and fortune in the United States as Frank Leslie. New York publisher
J. C. Derby remarked in his 1884 memoir that “Leslie deserves to
be called the pioneer and founder of illustrated journalism in America.
He understood what the great reading public in this country wanted, and
provided it, so that all tastes were satisfied by one or another of his
many publications." His flagship magazine, Frank Leslie’s
Illustrated Newspaper, began in 1855 and then, along with its rival
Harper’s Weekly, gained success and legitimacy covering
the Civil War. While the Illustrated Newspaper attempted to encompass
the increasingly varied post-Civil War reading public, Leslie’s
other periodicals were targeted at more specified audiences—including
German and Spanish readers, women, children, families, and religious Protestants—the
overall effect embodying the range of the diversified literary marketplace.
The aggregate circulation of all of Leslie’s weekly and monthly
magazines, according to one contemporary source, averaged about a half
million copies weekly. [3] Figure 1. “Fond of pictures—Too fond nearly by half.” Wood engraving, The Days’ Doings, June 5, 1869, 16. While employing racial stereotypes, this cartoon also indicates one venue where readers consumed the weekly: the male preserve of a barbershop. Moreover, the appearance of The Days’ Doings marked the migration of tawdry material from the pages of the Illustrated Newspaper, making the latter more suitable for the parlor table, as opposed to the barroom, barbershop, or hotel lobby, where the more brazen sporting magazine often could be found. (Figure 1) For example, after 1868 the Illustrated Newspaper ceased its regular depiction of violent crimes. The paper still was not above occasionally covering “scandalous” acts of violence, such as the 1872 murder of Wall Street speculator James Fisk Jr. by a victim of one of his swindles. But the Illustrated Newspaper’s subsequent visual reportage of murder cases offered more temperate contextual information, such as the "scene of the crime" and portraits of the protagonists, leaving The Days’ Doings to feature re-creations of fatal assaults and, its favorite, "crimes of passion," whose narratives combined titillation with cautionary morality. Similarly, illegal sports such as dog fighting and particularly bare-knuckle boxing disappeared from the Illustrated Newspaper’s pages by the early 1870s , taking up residence in The Days' Doings as the relatively more demure sibling turned to celebrating races, regattas, and baseball. (Figure 2) In short, with The Days’ Doings, Leslie could pursue a male readership with a repertoire of sex, scandal, sports, and violence that would have undermined the necessary propriety of his most valued publication. Figure 2. “The dog pit at Kit Burns’ during a fight.” Wood engraving, The Days’ Doings, September 26, 1868, 261. Leslie continued to avoid direct acknowledgement of his ownership of The Day’s Doings. But by the time Comstock took action, Leslie seemed to take impudent (and, as it turned out, imprudent) pleasure in leaving obvious clues. James Watts disappeared from The Days' Doings' masthead around 1870 in tandem with the announcement of a new address at 535 Pearl Street, coincidentally and conveniently next door to Leslie's publishing house; that particular fiction was finally eliminated after Leslie's publishing operations moved to Park Place in 1878. For the close reader of the paper there also were editorial hints of the relationship almost from the start. One of The Days’ Doings’ early editorials suggested Leslie’s authorship in the very manner in which it proposed that the paper was edifying to the public, expanding the scope of the illustrated press by commemorating and uplifting the everyday through the visual arts: |
Nearly
four years ago, the first number of THE DAYS’ DOINGS was issued. The
design of the publishers was to supply a need which the mass of the public
had long felt. Illustrated papers already existed, whose object was to furnish
correct pictorial representations of great public events, and of architectural
and scientific improvements, as well as fac-similes of the works
of great artists and sculptors. But there was no medium through which the
more commonplace, though by far the most interesting and startling, occurrences
of the day could be presented to the people by the pencil of the skillful
artist. |
As
if to deflect the skeptical, the editorial then asserted that “no
class of events” would be illustrated unless it had already appeared
in the British or “standard” U.S. pictorial press—and
then went on to lay it all at the feet of the New York Times. As
a paper celebrated for “the rigid morality of its tone,” the
Times had “furnished us with many of the choicest subjects
that have been illustrated in our pages.” It was a wily defense (used
previously in the Illustrated Newspaper) and, overall, a declaration
worthy of P. T. Barnum, for whom Leslie had worked in his first years in
the U.S. [5] However, unlike his mentor, Leslie, himself, was a figure of notoriety based on his heedlessly excessive life style—almost a caricature of the Gilded Age—and the scandal-ridden circumstances surrounding his divorce (involving his affair and then marriage to Miriam Follin Squier, the wife of the editor of the Illustrated Newspaper). Although he was unable to escape a scandalous reputation, Leslie managed to evade further legal harassment of The Days’ Doings by framing its profane material in didactic editorials and, shortly after his brush with prosecution, a more domestic orientation. “We intend that The Days’ Doings shall be a family journal,” a February 15, 1873 editorial announced, “fit for the instruction and amusement of intelligent, moral families, who wish to see the romantic world as it passes, typed and illustrated by pencil and pen.” Three years later, Leslie went one step further and changed the paper’s name. It was the intention of the “proprietor” of the newly christened New York Illustrated Times, to present “faithfully the dramatic side of human experience” and sustain “in all its departments, pictorial and literary, an elevated tone such as will commend it for universal household reading as in every way unexceptionable.” The notice closed with an admission that the Illustrated Times "will contain representations of all interesting occurrences happening after the publication each week of Frank Leslie’s Illustrated Newspaper, to which, in fact, the journal will be in all essential features an adjunct." [6] In marked contrast to the National Police Gazette, which usually thumbed its nose at any didactic mission, by 1876 some of the more outrageous aspects of The Days’ Doings were gone for good. Under the name of the New York Illustrated Times, so referential to and reverential of Leslie’s flagship publication, the paper seemed to have veered away from the barroom to the parlor. But the word adjunct was tantalizing and, to The Days' Doings' faithful readership, promising in its imprecision. That promise was often fulfilled by extensive pictorial coverage of news shunned by the respectable press, such as the 1878 arrest and suicide of the notorious abortionist “Madame Restell.” (Figure 3) The renamed newspaper continued to deliver a weekly dose of mayhem, its circulation hovering in the profitable range of 50,000. [7] Figure 3. “Madame Restell arrested on charges of malpractice.” Wood engraving, New York Illustrated Times, February 23, 1878, cover (305). |
To
The Days' Doings Page
2 |
To The Days' Doings Page 2 |